I would never demand that the federal government confiscate a big chunk of your income and spend it on me.
I would never tell you what kind of insurance you’re allowed to buy.
If you own a business, I would never tell you what you must pay your employees or what benefits you must provide.
I would never demand that your schools force your kids to read books that promote my political beliefs.
I would never demand that you wear a worthless mask in public, or that you put those worthless masks on your kids. (I also wouldn’t try to stop you from putting masks on your kids, even though I consider it akin to child abuse.)
I would never prevent your doctor from prescribing a drug he or she believes could help you recover from COVID.
I would never prevent your pharmacist from filling that prescription.
If you own a business, I would never presume to tell you whether or not you’re allowed to keep it open.
I would never prevent you from patronizing a business, attending a concert, or getting on an airplane just because you don’t have a vaccine passport.
I would never demand that you risk the nasty side-effects of a COVID vaccine to make me feel a teensy bit safer.
You do all of the above. And yet in an era where pundits are constantly wringing their hands about the deep divisions among Americans, you think I’m the problem – because I won’t give in to your never-ending demands to control my income, my business, my travel, and my medical decisions.
If you’d really like us to get along, it’s simple: leave me the hell alone — as I do you.
Given that Wee Goebbels is so threatened by logic and facts that he’ll suspend even those of us with a relatively small number of followers for daring to use logic and facts while arguing against The Narrative officially approved by The Party, I figure I should capture these tweets for posterity just in case.
Putting the text below:
1) Millions of unvaccinated bodies force the virus to select for vaccine-resistant mutations, which then become dominant.
2) Millions of vaccinated bodies force the virus to select for vaccine-resistant mutations, which then become dominant.
Only one makes (bio)logical sense.
#2 is exactly what Geert Vanden Bossche warned would be the result of VACCINATE EVERYONE! — as opposed to vaccinating only those at high risk.
He was, of course, censored by the (ahem) experts at Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. Wee Goebbels didn’t approve of his message.
But sure, good little lapdogs for The Party … blame the unvaccinated for a predictable result of the VACCINATE EVERYONE! campaign — because CNN and the other Official Party Media told you that’s what to believe, so it must be true. Don’t hurt your head thinking about it.
UPDATE: Man, I wish Twitter had an edit feature. A few people interpreted Only one makes (bio)logical sense to mean I was saying only choice 1) makes biological sense. ARGH!! No, I was of course saying only one of these two choices makes biological sense, but I should have made that more clear by phrasing it as Which makes (bio)logical sense? My bad.
In case you’ve wondered how Wee Goebbels justifies labeling verifiable facts as misinformation in order to ban tweets, posts, etc., he doesn’t like, Wee Goebbels at Facebook spelled it out for us.
Actually, by “us,” I mean he explained it to John Stossel. Facebook recently censored a video on climate change produced by Stossel as misleading and partially false. Stossel demanded to know which specific portions of the video were false or misleading – and, being Stossel, he was able to keep pushing until he got an answer from Facebook’s censor:
“The problem is the omission of contextual information rather than specific ‘facts’ being ‘wrong,’” he said.
Well, there you go! Wee Goebbels doesn’t have to find anything factually incorrect in your tweet, post, video, etc., in order to ban it as misleading, misinformation, partially false, or whatever label Wee Goebbels prefers that day. Nope, all Wee Goebbels has to do is decide you’ve committed the sin of the omission of contextual information.
How’s that for a perfect example of postmodernist gobbledygook? It reminds me of the explanation by the Dumbest Person in Congress that she may be factually wrong, but she’s morally right. The Wee Goebbels version is you may be factually right, but you’re contextually wrong.
And guess what? There’s no way to win that argument – by design, of course. Anyone can decide any tweet, post, video, etc., has omitted contextual information.
When CNN and the other COVID bed-wetters hype THERISE IN CASES BECAUSE DELTA SOMETHING AND THOSE DIRTY DEFIANT UNVACCINATED PEOPLE SOMETHING SOMETHING!!! every hour of every day, they don’t bother explaining that about only about one person per million people per day is actually dying of COVID. They don’t explain that the one person is likely around 80 years old with multiple co-morbidities.
So as far as I’m concerned, every COVID story put out by the bed-wetter news media is missing contextual information.
That’s just my opinion – and that’s the point. Wee Goebbels can now decide any message he would prefer the public not see or hear is, in his opinion, missing contextual information … which, like magic, turns verifiable facts into misinformation.
Which in turn means Wee Goebbels is doing exactly we suspected all along: he’s just banning any message he doesn’t like.
I knew appealing Wee Goebbels’ decision to suspend my Twitter account was pointless, but I did it anyway. Here’s the response:
So apparently Wee Goebbels had an entire support team look over my tweet, and (as a group, mind you) they decided that less than one COVID death per million per day is “misinformation,” even though I included the chart showing that the U.S. at the time of the tweet was reporting 0.82 deaths per million per day.
Boy, those must be interesting conversations in the Wee Goebbels meeting room.
“Okay, comrades, next appeal to review. We suspended this account because the account holder claimed there is less than one COVID death per million per day.”
“Is there any way we can check the veracity of that claim, Lord Goebbels?”
“Well, he included a screen cap of publicly available data showing a 7-day average of 0.82 deaths per million per day.”
“But 0.82 is much larger than 1.0, isn’t it, Lord Goebbels?”
“It is if I say it is.”
“Well then, Lord Goebbels, we agree with you. He’s clearly spreading misinformation.”
And so it goes in Twitter Land, where facts are “misinformation” if Wee Goebbels doesn’t like what the facts say. Welcome to Amerika.
Yeah, I’m suspended from Twitter again. Wee Goebbels once again declared that I’m “spreading misinformation” about COVID. Here’s the tweet, which consists of publicly available facts and screen caps from news articles. That’s what qualifies as “misinformation” to Wee Goebbels.
Someone needs to take Wee Goebbels outside and beat some sense into him.
I always enjoyed watching Cole Beasely’s acrobatic catches. Now I’m officially a fan:
NFL Player Says He Would Rather Retire Than Take COVID-19 Vaccine
Buffalo Bills player Cole Beasley has made clear his stance on the NFL’s new vaccine protocols, saying he ...
Some quotes:
“I will be outside doing what I do. I’ll be out in public. If you’re scared of me then steer clear, or get vaccinated,” the NFL player wrote on Twitter.
I’m surprised Twitter hasn’t closed his account. The push to guilt everyone into getting vaccinated — even if you’re young or have already had COVID — clearly isn’t about protecting the public. If you believe those wunnerful, wunnerful vaccines are effective, then you have no reason to fear being in a room with me or Cole Beasely.
“I’m not going to take meds for a leg that isn’t broken. I’d rather take my chances with Covid and build up my immunity that way. Eat better. Drink water. Exercise and do what I think is necessary to be a healthy individual. That is MY CHOICE based on MY experiences and what I think is best. I’ll play for free this year to live life how I’ve lived it from day one. If I’m forced into retirement, so be it.”
If you haven’t been watching Bret Weinstein’s interviews about COVID, the vaccines, and the alternative treatments that are being quashed, I’d urge you to do so. Here’s a video of a doctor explaining that ivermectin has been demonstrated over and over to be highly effective against COVID — both as prevention and treatment, with virtually no nasty side effects.
This is the type of stuff that will get you labeled as a right-wing conspiracy theorist and booted from Big-Tech social media. That’s a ridiculous charge to level against Weinstein, because he’s been a true-blue liberal for his entire career. (If you recognize his name, it’s likely because of the time the woke crowd at Evergreen College threw themselves a spoiled-brat riot and chased him out of his teaching job after Weinstein refused to stay home on “white people stay home day.”)
Weinstein is also a true-blue scientist. He’s been all over the COVID/vaccine issue, and unlike many on the left, he’s far more interested in actual data than in adhering to The Party’s narrative. As he’s pointed out in a few videos, if ivermectin could have ended the (ahem) “pandemic” months ago — and the evidence says it could have done exactly that — then some very powerful people had an interest in keeping the panic going instead of solving the problem.
Big Pharma? Of course. But ask yourself who else has benefited from coronhysteria. It’s a long list.
Update to above: best get watching. Weinstein’s channel is likely to be removed by YouTube soon.
And remember: the Little Goebbels working at Big-Tech social media actually think they’re the good guys. (So did the real Goebbels.)
Aaaand now the video I linked earlier today is disabled. I wrote quite a few posts about why The Anointed are opposed to free speech on the Fat Head blog. Here’s one example. It’s a shame we’ve come to this, and it won’t end well. You can read your history to learn how people who don’t have a voice eventually respond.
(Since this blog is more of a substitute for a Twitter timeline than an actual blog, I’ll often use the date as the post title and update the post throughout the day.)
——————————————————
Only a state run by liberals could regulate the marijuana business into needing a government bailout. Remember when the argument was that if we legalized pot (which I favor, by the way), governments would rake in tax revenue? California has demonstrated — again — what Ronald Reagan once said about government’s attitude towards business: If it moves, tax it. If it still moves, regulate it. When it stops moving, subsidize it.
California offers $100 million to rescue its struggling legal marijuana industry
Los Angeles will be the biggest beneficiary of the money, which was proposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom to help cannabis businesses acquire permanent licenses.
But let’s definitely tell everyone to get their (COVID-immune) teens vaccinated! Because who takes that “first do no harm” stuff seriously anyway? Big Pharma and The Party certainly don’t.
Draper teenager hospitalized with blood clots after COVID-19 vaccine shot
DRAPER, Utah (ABC4) – The day after his COVID-19 vaccine shot, 17-year-old Everest Romney felt his neck swelling. In the coming days, he suffered from severe headaches. His mother, who tells …
CDC Investigating Heart Inflammation in COVID-19 Vaccinated Teens, Young Adults
The CDC said it is investigating reports of heart inflammation in teenagers and young adults who have received the CCP virus vaccine.
Welcome to my first post in a looooong time. As I explained when I retired the Fat Head blog, I’ve gone into semi-retirement mode (meaning I no longer work the equivalent of two jobs) and have no intention of returning to writing long posts two or three times per week. I was satisfied to make comments on Twitter.
The people I refer to as Little Goebbels on Twitter had other ideas. I’ve been in Twitter jail for more than month. Little Goebbels informed me I was suspended for “spreading misinformation about COVID-19.” The “misinformation” tweet is below, along with Little Goebbels’ generous offer to appeal or delete the tweet.
My appeal was simple: I made five statements in that tweet. If I’m “spreading misinformation,” tell me which of the five points is false.
Despite assuring me “We’ll take a look and will respond as soon as possible,” more than a month went by. Apparently it takes a long time for Little Goebbels to re-read a tweet and say, Hey, wait a minute! All five statements are clearly true, so this can’t be misinformation!
But of course, all the Little Goebbels working at Big-Tech social media aren’t actually trying to stamp out misinformation. They’re simply acting as obedient lapdogs and silencing anyone who disagrees with The Party. They define “misinformation” as any message The Party doesn’t want people to hear.
Over the past year, they’ve de-platformed people for saying the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab, hydroxychloroquine can reduce COVID symptoms, and vitamin D can prevent COVID infection – all of which turned out to be true, yet all were labeled “misinformation” just a few months ago.
The only acceptable message is that the vaccines are completely wunnerful, wunnerful, they can’t possibly harm anyone, and everyone should get them. That’s what The Party wants, and Little Goebbels is nothing if not loyal to The Party.
The irony is that just a few years ago, I gave a speech explaining how social media was enabling the Wisdom of Crowds effect by bypassing the information gatekeepers and allowing us to share information with each directly. Turns out The Party and Little Goebbels aren’t big fans of The Marketplace of Ideas.
I’ve been hearing for years how awful it is that people who disagree politically are separating into their own worlds and not having discussions. Duh. “Progressives” clearly have no interest in discussions. To them, a “discussion” consists of “shut up and agree with us, or we’ll ban you.”
Since I’ll likely be banned again from Twitter for speaking truths The Ministry of Truth wants stifled, I’m resurrecting this blog as a place where I can speak my mind. They’ll be short posts, which I’ll likely update frequently … like my own little Twitter timeline.
I’ve also joined Gab (@TomDNaughton), but don’t spend much time there yet. As far as I can tell, Gab is 100% libertarians and conservatives. That’s the predictable result of Little Goebbels running Big-Tech social media: those who are censored for disagreeing with The Party go elsewhere, and we separate into our own echo chambers. History says this won’t end well.
So, Twitter, here’s my appeal: never in history have the people who silence opposing ideas turned out to be the good guys – and you’re not going to be the first. You’re the bad guys. You’re just too @#$%ing stupid and too caught up in the True Believer mentality to realize it.
Hmmm … interesting reactions to Arizona’s new immigration law, or anti-illegal-alien law, whichever term you prefer. Not surprisingly, politicians from my old state of California are up in arms about it. That’s because they prefer a different term for illegal aliens: future loyal voters — if only they can push another amnesty bill through Congress someday. Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco, has called for a moratorium on city-related travel to Arizona, and several members of the Los Angeles city council have proposed that L.A. stop doing any business with Arizona.
Mexican government officials are also up in arms, labeling the immigration law “abominable,” “a violation of human rights” and “discriminatory.” (Hard to argue with that last one; we do tend to treat criminals differently in America.)
Given all the hubub, I think the only fair course of action is to scrap the Arizona law and replace it with a new national immigration policy. Here are the provisions it ought to contain:
Foreigners will be admitted into the country according to their ability to contribute to our national progress.
Foreigners will be banned from interfering in our country’s politics.
Immigration officials must ensure that all immigrants have the necessary funds for their own sustenance and for the sustenance of their dependents.
Foreigners may be barred from the country if 1) their presence upsets the equilibrium of the national demographics, 2) they are deemed detrimental to our economic or national interests, 3) they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, 4) they have broken any of our laws, or 5) they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.
Immigration authorities must keep track of every single person in the country and assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants.
A National Population Registry must be established to keep track of every single individual who comprises the population of the country and verify each individual’s identity.
A national Catalog of Foreigners must be established to keep track of all foreign tourists and immigrants, and assign each individual with a unique tracking number.
Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into the country will be fined.
All foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may fined or imprisoned.
All foreigners who fail to obey the rules of the country will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned.
All foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be prosecuted and possibly imprisoned.
All foreigners who are deported and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization will be imprisoned for up to 10 years.
Foreigners who violate the terms of their visas will be imprisoned for to up to six years.
Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visas — such as working with out a permit – will face prosecution and possible imprisonment.
Citizens who help illegal aliens enter the country will themselves considered criminals and face prosecution.
Any citizen who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in this country will be subject to up to five years in prison.
Yes, yes, I know … it’s not exactly send me your huddled masses yearning to breathe free kind of stuff. Some of those policies come off as racist, classist, or downright harsh. So how can I possibly call them fair?
Simple: those are Mexico’s immigration policies. If Mexican officials think our laws are abominable and discriminatory, let’s adopt theirs instead.